使用sixxconfigurationipv6 over radvd，路由不工作

所以今天早上，我一直在使用我在reddit（所有地方）上find的指南在我的networking上configurationIPv6，地址是http://ipv6friday.org/blog/2012/06/ipv6-enabling-training/ 。 现在乍看起来，这似乎工作，但是，我正在testing的机器，虽然它正确地从范围内获得一个地址，不是路由的IPv6，我期望通过演示：

[ping6 -c 3 www.facebook.com]的[服务器]输出

PING www.facebook.com(www6-slb-10-03-frc1.facebook.com) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from www6-slb-10-03-frc1.facebook.com: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=133 ms 64 bytes from www6-slb-10-03-frc1.facebook.com: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=132 ms 64 bytes from www6-slb-10-03-frc1.facebook.com: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=133 ms --- www.facebook.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 132.464/133.152/133.669/0.506 ms 

和

[客户端]输出“ping6 -c 3 www.facebook.com”

• 数据包在configurationDebian L2TP / IPSec客户端时泛滥？
• 2个独立连接和路由的VPN隧道
• 亚马逊AWS VPC如何打开一个端口？
• 路由器/防火墙连接的不同vlan上的子网之间的路由
• 在单个Dell 6200交换机上的两个VLAN之间进行路由

 PING www.facebook.com(www6-slb-10-03-frc1.facebook.com) 56 data bytes --- www.facebook.com ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2016ms 

下面是相关configuration的副本。 我已经部分匿名使用的范围：

[server] /etc/radvd.conf

 interface eth0 { AdvSendAdvert on; MinRtrAdvInterval 3; MaxRtrAdvInterval 10; AdvHomeAgentFlag off; prefix 2a01:348:6:XXX::/64 { AdvOnLink on; AdvAutonomous on; AdvRouterAddr off; }; RDNSS 2a01:348:6:XXX::2 { AdvRDNSSLifetime 30; }; }; 

[客户端]输出“sudo ifconfig”

 wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:dd inet addr:192.168.1.31 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: 2a01:348:6:XXX:XXX:feff:fe81:70dd/64 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::c617:XXX:XXX:70dd/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:99921 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:74457 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:103144730 (103.1 MB) TX bytes:10523791 (10.5 MB) 

[客户端]输出“ip-6 route show dev wlan0”

 2a01:348:6:XXX::/64 proto kernel metric 256 expires 86405sec fe80::/64 proto kernel metric 256 default via fe80::202:XXX:XXX:7345 proto kernel metric 1024 hoplimit 64 

现在我想，这是默认路由IPv6回环，而不是通过2a01使用其他路由。 我的问题，在这里发生了什么，如何更改默认路由？

提前致谢！

编辑

根据要求，从服务器到Facebook的traceroute：

“traceroute -6 www.facebook.com”的[服务器]输出

 matthew@192:~$ traceroute -6 www.facebook.com traceroute to www.facebook.com (2a03:2880:2110:3f03:face:b00c::), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 gw-1459.lon-02.gb.sixxs.net (2a01:348:6:5b2::1) 80.071 ms 81.407 ms 81.361 ms 2 gblon02.sixxs.net (2a01:348:0:4:0:3:1:1) 81.271 ms 95.160 ms 109.436 ms 3 ge-0-0-5-20.cs0.thw.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348:0:4:0:3:0:1) 109.430 ms 109.065 ms 109.004 ms 4 xe-0-1-1.cs0.the.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348::36:1:1) 108.915 ms 108.905 ms 108.815 ms 5 xe-0-1-0.cs0.gs2.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348::24:1:1) 110.143 ms 110.089 ms 110.033 ms 6 xe-0-1-0-0.cs1.gs2.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348::40:1:1) 109.943 ms 46.947 ms 47.509 ms 7 xe-0-1-0.cs0.sov.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348::41:1:1) 53.724 ms 53.645 ms 54.847 ms 8 ge-1-1-5.rt0.sov.uk.goscomb.net (2a01:348::17:0:1) 56.107 ms 58.176 ms 59.559 ms 9 lonap.he.net (2001:7f8:17::1b1b:1) 63.359 ms 63.270 ms 65.433 ms 10 2001:7f8:4::80a6:1 (2001:7f8:4::80a6:1) 175.217 ms 142.380 ms 174.992 ms 11 xe-3-3-0.bb02.iad2.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::24d) 146.202 ms 148.312 ms 149.878 ms 12 ae9.bb02.frc1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::d6) 126.861 ms 127.347 ms 128.946 ms 13 ae2.dr01.frc1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::97) 129.830 ms ae2.dr02.frc1.tfbnw.net (2620:0:1cff:dead:beef::9b) 130.823 ms 132.602 ms 14 2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::163 (2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::163) 134.811 ms 2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::15d (2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::15d) 137.022 ms 2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::153 (2620:0:1cff:dead:beee::153) 139.157 ms 

而从IPv6客户端仍然通过radvd启用

“traceroute -6 www.facebook.com”的[客户端]输出

 matthew@matthew-laptop:~$ traceroute -6 www.facebook.com traceroute to www.facebook.com (2a03:2880:2110:3f01:face:b00c::), 30 hops max, 80 byte packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 * * * 4 * * * 5 * * * 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 * * * 9 * * * 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 * * * 14 * * * 15 * * * 16 * * *