电子邮件validation报告（得分中立）

我在尝试让我公司的电子邮件从Port25s身份validation服务返回更好的分数方面遇到了一些麻烦。 大部分的结果我都是中立的。 我已经包含了下面的报告。

我遇到了反向DNS，我被告知certificate我的邮件服务器的可信度至关重要？ 我的IP地址的反向DNS检查parsing为

ip-97-74-4-207.ip.secureserver.net 

这是正确的，还是应该联系我的托pipe服务提供商？

我承认这个问题的模糊性，并且道歉，我缺乏这方面的知识，如果有人能指出我的正确方向，我将非常感激。

• 如何阻止来自特定域名TLD的推荐人？
• 在垃圾邮件与Debian 8.2电子邮件
• 如何在Postfix上到达SMTP之前拒绝垃圾邮件
• Exchange 2007 – 从MY域发送垃圾邮件，但无效的随机用户
• Apache访问日志充满了未经授权和可疑的请求，如何采取行动

 From: [email protected] Sent: 12 November 2015 15:09 To: [email protected] Subject: Authentication Report This message is an automatic response from Port25's authentication verifier service at verifier.port25.com. The service allows email senders to perform a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at <verifier- [email protected]>. Thank you for using the verifier, The Port25 Solutions, Inc. team ========================================================== Summary of Results ========================================================== SPF check: neutral DomainKeys check: neutral DKIM check: neutral Sender-ID check: neutral SpamAssassin check: ham ========================================================== Details: ========================================================== HELO hostname: p3plsmtps2ded01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net Source IP: 208.109.80.58 mail-from: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------- SPF check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (SPF-Result: None) ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): health-n-life.com. SPF (no records) health-n-life.com. 3600 IN TXT ""v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:97.74.4.207 ~all"" ---------------------------------------------------------- DomainKeys check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (message not signed) ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): ---------------------------------------------------------- DKIM check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (message not signed) ID(s) verified: NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs (RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim- base-10) and verification may fail for older versions. If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM. ---------------------------------------------------------- Sender-ID check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- Result: neutral (SPF-Result: None) ID(s) verified: [email protected] DNS record(s): health-n-life.com. SPF (no records) health-n-life.com. 3600 IN TXT ""v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:97.74.4.207 ~all"" ---------------------------------------------------------- SpamAssassin check details: ---------------------------------------------------------- SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07) Result: ham (1.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [208.109.80.58 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.4 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: Multipart message mostly text/html MIME 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5025] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 TVD_SPACE_RATIO No description available. ========================================================== Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451) ========================================================== SPF and Sender-ID Results ========================= "none" No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain. "neutral" The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized to send mail using the sender's DNS domain. "pass" The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain. "policy" The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is unacceptable. "fail" This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain. "softfail" The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect. "temperror" The message could not be verified due to some error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to retrieve a policy record from DNS. A later attempt may produce a final result. "permerror" The message could not be verified due to some error that is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result. DKIM and DomainKeys Results =========================== "none" The message was not signed. "pass" The message was signed, the signature or signatures were acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed verification tests. "fail" The message was signed and the signature or signatures were acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification test(s). "policy" The message was signed but the signature or signatures were not acceptable to the verifier. "neutral" The message was signed but the signature or signatures contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other failures not covered elsewhere in this list. "temperror" The message could not be verified due to some error that is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to retrieve a public key. A later attempt may produce a final result. "permerror" The message could not be verified due to some error that is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result. ========================================================== Original Email ========================================================== Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from p3plsmtps2ded01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (208.109.80.58) by verifier.port25.com id h8i0ms20i3g2 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 07:09:18 -0500 (envelope-from <[email protected]>) Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=neutral (SPF-Result: None) [email protected] Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) [email protected] Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=neutral (SPF- Result: None) [email protected] Received: from ip-97-74-4-207.secureserver.net ([97.74.4.207]) by p3plsmtps2ded01.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with : DED : id gc9A1r04x4TzU1d01c9AVU; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 05:09:11 -0700 x-originating-ip: 97.74.4.207 Received: from [37.211.64.190] (port=62782 helo=MoPC) by ip-97-74-4-207.secureserver.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1Zwqgg-0002Bm-8T for [email protected]; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 05:09:10 -0700 From: "Mo Gould" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: TEest Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 15:09:07 +0300 Message-ID: <[email protected]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0018_01D11D5C.1591D2D0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdEdQuwnhjHqgzOYRNeC2ozux0z9gw== Content-Language: en-gb This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01D11D5C.1591D2D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Test message ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01D11D5C.1591D2D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" = xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft- com:office:office" = xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" = xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META = HTTP- EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = charset=3Dus-ascii"><meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 = (filtered medium)"><style><!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-priority:99; color:#0563C1; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-priority:99; color:#954F72; text-decoration:underline;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-compose; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; color:windowtext;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-fareast-language:EN-US;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!- -[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit"> <o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data=3D"1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=3DEN-GB = link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72"><div class=3DWordSection1><p = class=3DMsoNormal>Test message<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html> ------=_NextPart_000_0018_01D11D5C.1591D2D0--